gratis dating site nl - Columbia university racial preferences in dating study

Far from seeing a contradiction between his support for the civil rights movement and his opposition to the “minority friendly” admissions policies in , Mosk viewed them as one and the same.

The problem is not that no academically gifted African-American students are seeking admission to college and universities. But there are not enough at the very top tiers to satisfy the demand, and efforts to change that have had a pernicious effect on admissions up and down the academic pecking order, creating a serious credentials gap at every competitive level.

Unfortunately, a student whose entering academic credentials are well below those of the average student in a particular school will likely earn grades to match. Bowen and former Harvard President Derek Bok, who were pioneers in formulating affirmative action policies, admit that the credentials gap has serious consequences.

Bakke had a college grade point average (GPA) of 3.46 and an undergraduate science GPA of 3.44 (back before grade inflation’s long march through the academy) as well as a commendable record of volunteer emergency room service at a local hospital, where he frequently worked late into the night with victims of car accidents and street fights.[4] By contrast, the average “disadvantaged track” admittee in 1973 had a college GPA of 2.88 and an undergraduate science GPA of 2.62. Bakke’s Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores put him at the 97th percentile (Science); 96th percentile (Verbal); 94th percentile (Quantitative); and 72nd percentile (General Information).

On the other hand, the average “disadvantaged track” admittee in 1973 had MCAT scores in the 35th percentile (Science); 46th percentile (Verbal); 24th percentile (Quantitative); and 33rd percentile (General Information).

He was rejected both times, however, under circumstances that pointed strongly to his race.[3] At the time, UC–Davis Medical School had a two-track admissions system.

The first 84 out of 100 seats in the class were given to the most qualified applicants regardless of their race, ethnicity, or other disadvantage. The remaining 16 seats were reserved for the disadvantaged, but in practice, “disadvantaged” always meant members of racial minorities.

I have no doubt that those who originally conceived of race-preferential admissions policies nearly 50 years ago were acting in good faith.

By lowering admissions standards for African-American and Hispanic students at elite colleges and universities, they hoped to increase the number of minority students on campus and ultimately to promote their integration into high-status careers. Should we allow the principle of color blindness under the law to be sacrificed in the hope that in the long run, it will help us become a society of equal opportunity?

In they wrote, “College grades [for beneficiaries of affirmative action] present a … The grades earned by African-American students at the [elite schools we studied] often reflect their struggles to succeed academically in highly competitive academic settings.”Why is it not better to get bad grades at a top school than better grades at a school that is one or two rungs down from the top?

Everyone knows that a good student can get in over his head if he is placed in a classroom with students whose level of academic preparation is much higher than his own.

By 1976, when Mosk was writing, we owed it to ourselves to be more skeptical.

Tags: , ,